Loading…
The best value in each row is in bold, marked “best”. In the global top 100,000 and in each field and subfield, the figure is a share of the institution’s own top 2% scientists, its bar out of 100%; the bar of “Top 2% scientists” is against the most in the row. Fields and subfields: each institution’s ten largest, as on its page; a count opens those researchers in the interactive table. Institutions with 10 or more top 2% scientists, which have a page.
This page online: https://topcitedscientists.com/institutions/compare/
Data: Ioannidis, John P.A. (2026), ‘August 2026 data-update for “Updated science-wide author databases of standardized citation indicators”’, Mendeley Data, v9, doi:10.17632/btchxktzyw.9. 2025 impact list, ranked by composite citation score (c) excluding self-citations.
Printed from topcitedscientists.com, an independent site not affiliated with or endorsed by the dataset authors, Stanford University, Elsevier or Scopus. This is not an official document.